ABSTRACT
To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of Wei nasal jet tube (WNJT) in painless gastroscopy in patients over age of 60, 80 patients aged 60 years or older scheduled for gastroscopy under propofol mono-sedation in Beijing Friendship Hospital were divided into WNJT group ( n=40) and nasal cannula group ( n=40) according to the random number table method from January to June 2021. The main observation indicator was the difference in the incidence of hypoxemia between the two groups, the secondary observation indicators included the lowest pulse blood oxygen saturation (SpO 2), interventions related to hypoxemia, adverse events such as body movement, cough, epistaxis, sore throat, and the satisfaction of physicians, anesthetists and patients. The results showed that the procedure time and total dosage of propofol were no significant differences between the two groups ( P>0.05). Compared with the nasal cannula group, the incidence of hypoxemia in the WNJT group was significantly lower [2.5% (1/40) VS 25.0% (10/40), χ2=8.538, P=0.003], the lowest SpO 2 was significantly higher (97.7%±2.5% VS 92.6%±5.8%, t=5.093, P<0.001), and the use of jaw lift was reduced [5.0% (2/40) VS 35.0% (14/40), χ2=11.250, P=0.001]. The adverse events were not significantly different between the two groups ( P>0.05), but no case of epistaxis and sore throat occurred in the nasal cannula group. The two groups were comparable in terms of the satisfaction of patients, anesthetists and physicians ( P>0.05). In conclusion, WNJT can be used safely during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in patients over 60 years old, with less incidence of hypoxemia and the number of airway interventions. But violent operation should be avoided to reduce the incidence of epistaxis and sore throat.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To assess the influence of age on the safety of propofol mono-sedation for adult patients undergoing painless gastroscopy.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted on data of 321 patients scheduled for painless gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation. According to the age, patients were divided into youth group (116 cases, 18-44 years), middle-aged group (103 cases, 45-59 years) and elderly group (102 cases, 60-80 years). The procedure time, the total dosage of propofol, the occurrence of airway obstruction or hypoxemia, the use of airway interventions including airway opening maneuvers and facemask ventilation, lowest SpO 2, adverse cardiovascular events (including hypertension, hypotension, tachycardia, and bradycardia), and the use of ephedrine during painless gastroscopy were observed. Results:There was significant difference regarding the total dosage of propofol among youth group (173.2±47.0 mg), middle-aged group (158.8±41.3 mg) and elderly group (137.8±26.3 mg) ( F=21.761, P<0.001). The total dosage of propofol was significantly lower in the elderly group compared with the middle-aged group ( P<0.017) and youth group ( P<0.017), and that in the middle-aged group was significantly lower than that in the youth group ( P<0.017). The incidence of hypoxemia was 12.9% (15/116) in the youth group, 15.5% (16/103) in the middle-aged group and 25.5% (26/102) in the elderly group, with significant difference among three groups ( χ2=5.711, P=0.017). Moreover, the incidence of hypoxemia was significantly higher in the elderly group compared with the middle-aged group ( P<0.017) and youth group ( P<0.017). The incidences of hypotension, bradycardia and total adverse cardiovascular events were 5.2% (6/116), 4.9% (5/103) and 11.8% (12/102), 1.7% (2/116), 2.9% (3/103) and 7.8% (8/102), and 11.2% (13/116), 10.7% (11/103) and 20.6% (21/102) respectively in youth, the middle-aged and the elderly group. There were no significant differences in the above indicators among the three groups ( P>0.05). However, compared with those of the young and the middle-aged patients, the occurrence of hypotension, bradycardia and total adverse cardiovascular events in the elderly patients were on the rise. There were no significant differences among the three groups in other indices( P>0.05). Conclusion:Total dosage of propofol may need to be decreased gradually with the increase of age of patients undergoing gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation. Compared with young and middle-aged patients, elderly patients have a significantly higher incidence of hypoxemia, with a tendancy of total adverse cardiovascular events increase, so the safety of painless gastroscopy is reduced for these patients.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate left lateral position I-scope tracheal intubation for optimizing anesthesia time during the patient′s general anesthesia before endoscopic submucosal dissection.Methods:A total of 150 patients with early upper gastrointestinal cancer were enrolled in the study for endoscopic submucosal dissection in Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University from March to December 2018. Patients were randomly divided into three groups with 50 patients in each group. The SL group underwent I-scope tracheal intubation in the left lateral position, SS group underwent I-scope tracheal intubation in the supine position, and MS group underwent Macintosh laryngoscope tracheal intubation in the supine position. Preoperative non-essential anesthesia time (the time between successful intubation and operation), attempts for tracheal intubation and complications related to intubation were analyzed.Results:The preoperative non-essential anesthesia time was 8.55±2.16 min in SL group, 10.44±2.43 min in SS group, and 10.56±3.20 min in MS group, with significant difference among three groups ( F=9.08, P<0.001), and the time in SL group was shorter than that in SS group ( P<0.001) and MS group ( P<0.001). However, there was no statistical difference in non-essential anesthesia time between the SS group and MS group ( P=0.819). The success rate of first attempt intubation was 96.0% (48/50) in SL group, 90.0% (45/50) in SS group, and 92.0% (46/50) in MS group, with no significant differences among three groups ( χ2=2.601, P=0.627). The incidences of cough and expectoration, dry mouth and mucosal injury showed no statistical differences among three groups during transference to the ward after tracheal catheter removal (all P>0.05). The incidence of sore throat in MS group (38.0%, 19/50) was higher than that in SL group (18.0%, 9/50, P<0.05) and SS group (18.0%, 9/50, P<0.05), while the difference was not statistically significant between SL group and SS group ( P>0.05). Conclusion:I-scope tracheal intubation in the left lateral position may shorten the preoperative anesthesia time in patients undergoing general anesthesia for the operation in the left lateral position, and optimize overall anesthesia time.